Succeeding at Other Minds

Series: Evaluating Reality Using Science

Written by Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, Intentional Insights Co-Founder and President.

Graphics by Cerina Gillilan

Imagine you’re really excited about a new idea for a collaborative project. You send an e-mail about it to a friend who you just know is going to be as excited as you. You’re waiting on pins and needles for a response, checking your inbox every hour. A couple of hours pass, then a couple more. You’re getting stressed and anxious, waiting on the edge of your seat for a reply. The next day goes by, and another day. You’re very confused about why you haven’t received a response. Why isn’t your friend writing you back? Doesn’t she like you? Is she upset with you? What’s wrong?

Has this ever happened to you? It’s happened to me many times. My Autopilot System goes into overdrive, imagining various negative scenarios and sending out stress-inducing hormones. Such catastrophizing is a common type of thinking error, one that research shows undermines mental and physical wellbeing.

Another thinking error in this scenario is that one’s friend will share the same opinion that you do about your new idea. Studies on a cognitive bias called the “false consensus effect” indicate that our Autopilot System significantly overestimates the extent to which others agree with our opinions. This is especially true for those close to us, such as our friends and family. As a result, we make mistakes when we use our intuitions to predict the behavior of others around us, including our immediate social circle.

However, the false consensus effect applies more broadly as well. Our gut reactions tend to perceive “the public” as a whole as sharing our perspective. This problem is especially problematic when it causes us to overrate substantially the extent to which others will agree with our political opinions. Such overestimation undermines our ability to engage in healthy political discussions and contributes to political polarization. No wonder we don’t do well as intuitive psychologists!

So how can we work against the false consensus effect? First, remember a previously-discussed strategy, namely that our mental maps never match the territory of reality. And our mental maps certainly do not match the mental maps of others!

To keep the latter fact in mind, here is a very useful mental habit to adopt: avoiding “failing at other minds.” What does that mean in practice? Essentially, when trying to imagine how other people think about the world, take a moment to stop and remember that their perspective is inherently different from your own. This is a specific case of a broader de-biasing strategy of imagining the opposite, in this case taking the perspective of the other person. And why is this helpful? Well, our intuitive theory of mind, the way we understand the minds of others, tends to model others as ourselves. Our Autopilot System perceives others as understanding the world and having the same idea of what is true as we do. Internalizing the mental habit of avoiding failing at other minds helps remind us of this problematic tendency, and work against it. Through developing this mental habit, we can be elephant whisperers and retrain our Autopilot System to have a more intentional approach to predicting the thoughts, emotions, and behaviors of others. Thus, we can evaluate reality more clearly and gain greater agency by making more effective decisions that help us reach our goals. We can succeed at other minds!

Now, what are the strategies for most effectively learning this information, and internalizing the behaviors and mental patterns that can help you succeed? Well, educational psychology research illustrates that engaging with this information actively, personalizing it to your life, linking it to your goals, and deciding on a plan and specific next steps you will take are the best practices for this purpose. So take the time to answer the questions below to gain long-lasting benefit from reading this article:

  • Are there any instances where catastrophizing has negatively influenced your wellbeing?
  • Has the false consensus effect ever steered you wrong in personal interactions? What about in your predictions of public opinions and political engagement?
  • In what ways, if any, do you think the mental habit of avoiding failing at other minds can help you have a better life and gain greater agency?
  • If you think it can be beneficial for you, what kind of plan can you make and what specific steps can you take to internalize this mental habit?



____________________________________________________________________

Please DONATE if you found this article helpful. Intentional Insights is a 501(c)3 nonprofit, and we are able to create our content only thanks to the generous support of readers like you (your donations are tax-deductible). We also invite you to volunteer and buy our merchandise. To avoid missing out on content that help you reach your goals, subscribe to the Intentional Insights monthly newsletter and RSS feed. Thank you!

Recent Posts 10

How To Be Perfect!

How To Be Perfect!

September 19, 2016

Do you want to have a perfect job? A perfect body? A perfect family life? Perfect health? A perfect relationship?

On Being a Weird American on 9/11

On Being a Weird American on 9/11

September 11, 2016

Being "weird" is a great way to reframe your identity

Free Money Is No Joke: Confessions of a (Former) Skeptic of Basic

Free Money Is No Joke: Confessions of a (Former) Skeptic of Basic Income

September 5, 2016

How research convinced me to update my beliefs about basic income

Video: Want To Be Young and Healthy Forever? Here's The Science That Will Help.

August 29, 2016

This video highlights the cutting edge of rejuvenation research to help you be young and healthy forever.

How Neuroscience Can Address Police Racial Profiling

How Neuroscience Can Address Police Racial Profiling

August 22, 2016

Behavioral insights can provide pragmatic strategies to solve deep social problems.

Your Feelings Are Not Your Fault (Mostly)

Your Feelings Are Not Your Fault (Mostly)

August 15, 2016

How should you deal with your feelings?

How To Resolve Disagreements about Effective Giving: Collaborativ

How To Resolve Disagreements about Effective Giving: Collaborative Truth-Seeking (Part 2)

August 8, 2016

Reach a shared understanding about effective giving through research-based strategies.

How To Resolve Disagreements About Effective Giving: The Problem

How To Resolve Disagreements About Effective Giving: The Problem with Debates (Part 1)

August 1, 2016

How and when are debates problematic for addressing effective giving?

A Reason-Oriented Perspective on Meanings and Values

A Reason-Oriented Perspective on Meanings and Values

July 25, 2016

How can you explore meanings and values through reason, logic, and community?

A Pastor Walks Into a Room Full of Atheists

A Pastor Walks Into a Room Full of Atheists

July 18, 2016

How and why you should find community in diversity.